In this article I will be going through Universi Domini Gregis by Pope John Paul II to see if the laws of the Conclave that gave the world Francis, were broken and if he was not validly elected.
It is seven years since we had the conclave that gave us Pope Francis, with all this craziness and madness that has happened ever since, and then the worship of Pagan Idols in the Vatican Garden and Basilicas, all our worries and concerns seem to not matter and when we want to investigate or do these reports, certain groups of Catholics say it is not necessary and just obey and not worry what is going on. But I am with many who think there needs to be an investigation and here we will look at what news reports said those fateful days after the conclave and all the breaking news.
Let us look at some dates and newspaper reports gathered from the Chronology Of Team Bergoglio
“Nov. 22, 2014: John Bingham, reporter for the Telegraph, writes his report, Pope Francis: how cardinals’ Conclave lobbying campaign paved way for Argentine pontiff, which appears on the online edition at 8:15 PM London time. It is in this report that the allegations of Dr. Ivereigh, regarding vote canvassing are first made news. All the subsequent reports will react to this. (On Nov. 26, this article was published, with later information, in a Spanish translation by Secretum Meum Mihi Blog, here.)”
“Nov. 23, 2014: A report by John Bingham, entitled, “English Cardinal ‘lobbied for Pope’“, is published on p. 16 in the Sunday Telegraph, UK, regarding Dr. Ivereigh’s book and the allegations concerning the vote canvassing by Cardinals in days preceding the Conclave of 2013 (according to Maggie Doherty’s Letter to the Editor in the Daily Telegraph, Nov. 25). An image of page 16 of the Sunday Telegraph is subsequently published by a Spanish blog on Dec. 1 (here)”
“Nov. 24, 2014: Libertà e Persona, publishes Lorenzo Bertocchi’s, La “squadra di Bergoglio”, which exposes the story for the first time in the Italian language. (This link discovered & added to chronology on Dec. 15).”
“Nov. 25, 2014: In a Letter to the Editor of the Daily Telegraph, Maggie Doherty, the spokeswoman for Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor denies that Cardinal Bergoglio was approached by Cardinals or consented to the work of “Team Bergoglio”. (See here for an image of that letter).
“Nov. 25, 2014: The From Rome blog reports the events known and speculated about the canonical implications of UDG 81, in “If Ivereigh is to be believed, was Bergoglio’s election invalid?“
“Nov. 26, 2014: The From Rome blog adds an addendum concerning the implications of canon 171 to its previous report.
Nov. 27, 2014: Returns to the topic of “Team Bergoglio” in, Ivereigh + UDG 81 = A Radical Problem for the Pope, which discusses both the letter by Maggie Doherty and the canonical reasons why it appears that the election of Cardinal Bergoglio may now be open to a challenge. This article was republished in a rather good Italian translation by Chiesa e post Concilio, on Dec. 2.”
These and all the reports gathered show how the news about the invalid conclave was being reported around the world, but there is something even more, a book by Cardinal Danneels which admits exactly what is going on, but was not given permission to publish it in Italian by the Vatican. Lifesitenews reported on this on September 25th 2015, and this quote explains what is going on currently:
“The election of Bergoglio was prepared in Sankt-Gallen, without doubt. And the main lines of the program the Pope is carrying out are those that Danneels and Co were starting to discuss more than ten years ago.”
In other words, there was no real conclave or election, it was prepared in advanced and rigged. What then did we witness on global TV?
I believe what we saw was a fixed take over of the Catholic Church that let in so much darkness, error and confusion. In the appearance of how Jorge Mario Bergoglio came out onto the Loggia of Saint Peter’s, there was nothing Catholic there, nothing good, it was dark and very much Anti-Catholic, because he rejected the Traditional Garments of the Pope that was to be worn after the election and rejected the Papal Office and Apartments, for a hotel.
What Do We Know About The Voting That Took Place?
From Gloria.TV on April 13th 2019, and I quote:
“Gerard O’Connell’s book “The Election of Pope Francis” (2019) contains all “secret” details about Francis’ election.
The second ballot:
At this point, Scola asked his supporters Bagnasco, Betori and Caffarra to elect Bergoglio.
Ortega y Alamino received Bergoglio’s pre-conclave speech exclaiming, “Now, I have a text of the new pope!”
Maradiaga and Santos Abril asked Bergoglio about his lung surgery. Bergoglio assured them that he was healthy. Hummes told Lehmann that Bergoglio was not involved in Argentinean politics.
The fifth ballot:
Bergoglio embraced Scola whom he would later treat like an enemy”
This is an excommunicationable offense, what these Cardinals have done in rigging the election and then sharing the voting and who was voting for whom, the conclaves are to be secret and no one is to know whom was voted for and how it was being done.
The Appointments Of Cardinals and Changing of the Curia, To Pontifical Academies, To The Secret Archieve and Bishops Are Null and Void? Yes.
The Bishops Appointed by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio, are as what happened to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, when he appointed and ordained bishops without Papal Mandate, “Canon 1382, which punishes with latae sententiae excommunication ALL bishops who consecrate bishops without a Pontifical Mandate (when the Apostolic See is not impeded), which is what anyone who collaborates with the usurpation of the Papal Office does.”
Now, let us look at the Dioceses of Kansas
Let us just take the example of Kansas to see how much chaos has been caused by the changes in the hierarchy done by Bergoglio.
Diocese of Salina Kansas Yellow Sector
New Bishop Gerald Lee Vincke, Appointed by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio to take over the Diocese by Bishop Edward Joseph Weisenburger, Appointed by Pope Benedict XVI, moved to Tucson Arizona by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio.
Vincke’s Principle Consecrator was Archbishop Joseph Fred Naumann of Kansas City Kansas
Principal Co-Consecrators: Bishop Carl Frederick Mengeling of Lansing Michigan
Bishop Joseph Gerard Hanefeldt of Grand Island Nebraska.
Archbishop Joseph Fred Naumann of Kansas City Kansas: Blue Sector
Appointed and installed as Archbishop by Pope Benedict XVI, but Bergoglio appointed him to Diocese Administrator of Kansas City-Saint Joseph Missouri, their Bishop was Bishop Robert William Finn, “Several commentators from the Catholic News Service, the National Catholic Reporter (based in Kansas City) and secular media like the Huffington Post said that Bishop Finn was ‘low hanging fruit” after his conviction of a misdemeanor failure to make a timely report of accusations of child endangerment against one of his priests to civil authorities in 2010.”
Bishop Finn spoke out against embryonic stem cell research, “Unlike other bishops who moved offender priests from parish to parish to shield them, Finn, when he understood the gravity of the situation, removed the accused priest from parish life and contact with children. Finn admitted mishandling of the case. Admissions of mistakes were not sufficient for some people who wanted a scalp. Catholic League president Bill Donohue recently reiterated the role of the SNAP (Survivors Network of People Abused by Priests) organization is this attempt to punish the highest reaches of church hierarchy that they could. How sad that this “conviction” seems to have factored into the Vatican’s decision to accept his resignation.” Read More From Crisis Magazine.
The Bishop Of Dodge City Kansas, Bishop John Balthasar Brungardt, appointed and installed by Pope Benedict XVI: Green Sector
The Bishop Of Wichita Kansas Carl Alan Kemme appointed and installed by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio: Red Sector
Principal Consecrator Archbishop Joseph Fred Naumann
Principal Co-Consecrators Archbishop George Joseph Lucas of Omaha Nebraska, and Bishop Thomas John Joseph Paprocki Springfield Illinois
The Bishop Appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to the Wichita Diocese of Bishop Michael Owen Jackels, but Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio moved him to Dubuque Iowa.
When installed in Iowa, his consecrators without Papal Mandate was:
Bishop Thomas Robert Zinkula, Bishop William Michael Joensen
Then his co-consecrators were Bishop James Douglas Conley of Lincoln Nebraska and Bishop John Balthasar Brungardt of Dodge City Kansas.
These men appointed as Bishops by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio were done without Papal Mandate and illicitly, those by Pope Benedict XVI had Papal Mandate and were legit.
We must therefore ask, is these men appointed by Bergoglio truly are bishops and priests faithful to Christ or are they part of this new One World Religion promoted by Bergoglio with that new Abrahamic Religious House In Abu Dabi?
Are these men stealing from our parishes and using the money for this project and other illegal projects that have been covered by Church Militant and others, regarding Peter’s Pence, USCCB Taxes, and other so called donations used to buy property, do parties, and other such things?
I urge you to do your own study to see what is going on in your diocese and even your state or country by going to Catholic Hierarchy.
Finally, if your bishop begins to say something weird, strange or simply non-Catholic, you can be sure he is not your Bishop and should not be listened to, it is the job of the Bishop to defend and confirm the Faith, not cause confusion or scandal. The new Pope, or if Benedict does return when Bergoglio leaves, it will be his job to fix this mess.